California Evictions in a COVID-19 World

male wearing a face mask in response to covid-19 stsicking his head outside of a window

As the COVID-19 crisis began in California, concern grew among lawmakers of potential widespread evictions due to the potential economic ramifications created by the virus. State and local governments were directing individuals to stay at home and encouraged social distancing.  These state and local directives would necessarily impact businesses that relied on people to congregate and socialize.

In response, Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-28-20, which suspended until May 31, 2020, any California state law that limited a local government’s ability to impose a moratorium or limitations on evictions resulting from or related to COVID-19.

Governor Newsom’s executive order essentially left it to local governments to decide how to deal with evictions. Following the issuance of Executive Order N-28-20, local cities and counties scrambled to pass laws or ordinances that placed a moratorium on evictions related to COVID-19.

Four days after Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-28-20, he issued Executive Order N-33-20, which required all individuals to “Shelter in Place”. The issuance of N-28-20 was now more important than ever. After all, how would tenants pay their rent if they were forced to stay home?

On March 27, 2020, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-37-20. The new Executive Order builds on N-28-20 and established a statewide moratorium on evictions for certain tenants. These certain tenants are defined as any individual whose inability to pay their rent is related to COVID-19.

The Executive Order states that no tenant can be evicted, provided that they do or have done the following:

  1. Paid their rent prior to the issuance of the order;
  2. Notify their landlord in writing before the rent is due or no more than 7 days after it is due of their need to delay the payment of some or all the rent because of a reason related to COVID-19;
  3. The COVID-19 related reason includes, but is not limited to, layoff, furlough, inability to work because of COVID-19 diagnosis or having to care for someone with COVID-19.
  4. The tenant must provide documentation verifying the COVID-19 related reason.

When reviewing Executive Order N-37-20, it’s important to understand that it does not impose a moratorium on all evictions in the State of California. The order is quite specific: the moratorium only applies to tenants who can provide a COVID-19 related reason for their inability to pay rent.  Evictions for criminal activity, failure to pay for a non-COVID -19 related reason, etc. can still proceed.

The moratorium is also only in place for a period of approximately 60 days or until May 31, 2020. After that time, unless another Executive Order is issued, landlords are free to commence eviction proceedings.

More importantly, a tenant is still obligated to pay rent, as the Executive Order merely places a moratorium on evictions of certain tenants. There is no rent forgiveness. In fact, if a tenant has the ability at all to pay their rent, they should. Otherwise, they will likely be evicted once the moratorium has expired.

The Executive Order is also not automatic. Tenants must provide notice to their landlord that they will not be able to pay some or all of their rent due to COVID-19. If a tenant does not provide the requisite notice they will not enjoy the protections of the Executive Order.

In addition, tenants must provide the landlord with the requisite “verifiable” documentation to support their COVID-19 related reason. Such documentation could include medical bills, layoff or furlough notices. Landlords should be liberal with the type of documentation they accept as “verifiable”. Given the impact of COVID-19 on individuals, a Court would likely side with the tenant in any dispute regarding acceptable documentation.

Finally, Executive Order N-37-20 does not supersede any local ordinance or order that imposes stricter provisions than imposed by the State. The Executive Order only establishes a minimum for the eviction moratorium, allowing local governments free to impose stricter guidelines. As such, it is imperative that landlords verify whether there is any local ordinance or order that imposes further limitations on evictions.

About Tim Burke

Tim is a licensed attorney in California and Nevada. He brings over 19 years of transactional and litigation experience to JohnHart. Prior to joining JohnHart, Tim was in private practice providing legal guidance to clients on Real Estate, financial, corporate, estate planning, and employment matters.

Leave a Reply

*